No Enemies to the White

So, I’ve mostly moved on from this blog. I don’t really it update anymore for a number of reasons. Though, rather than alienate tons of people with a laundry list of objections, I’ll just say that I don’t really consider myself part of the AltRight or a “conservative.” The problem I have with the term “AltRight” is that it presupposes one subscribes to a set of political positions on various issues. Whether it be capitalism, religion, modern art, feminism, environmentalism, sexuality, traditionalism etc.. on many of these subjects I clearly identify more with leftists, or at the very least a Nixonian conservatism(especially his private conversations.)  More importantly though, I’m pro-white first and foremost. Pretty much have to be at this point. I agree with Richard Spencer in his assertion that conservatives cannot seem to bring themselves to advocate for explicitly White or European interests. They always have to prioritize some other pet issue, or at the very least incorporate a kind of admixture that they insist “must be necessary for civilization.” It essentially becomes a right intersectionalism counterpart to the feminist variety.  I reject intersectionality, in order to prioritize defending the interests of white people…any of them, regardless of their stance on pretty much any subtopics(the flat earth people really push my limits on this though.)

We’re in a struggle for survival because we’re white. “Blackness” is as contrived of an identity as ever, but in almost any outgroup confrontation, a black tranny from Brooklyn will find an ally and a brother in an Oakland gang member or cab driving Somali refugee. In the future, every white person will have to choose a side, either pro-white or anti-white. If a group of muslims was attacking a pretty teenage white girl, would you cheer them on because you hate how shrill many western women have become? What about if they were attacking an openly gay, white software engineer or homeless man? Would you give them the thumbs up for taking out a “degenerate?” Or would you reluctantly come to the defense of a long lost brother or sister in blood? I know whose side I would be on.  We can and should debate the types of societies we want to live in, but in the end we do not necessarily all have to adopt the same system.  The southeastern United States seems ripe for the kind of neoconfederate christian ethnotheocracy many reactionaries crave. The northwest seems an ideal enclave for identitarian irreligious hipster fascists. The west coast is a natural fit for a Moldbuggian technocratic monarchy where geek “hWhites” can be free to practice transplanetary capitalism and indulge their asian fetishes.

France is not Germany is not Iceland is not South Carolina and never will be. Every identitarian is well aware of this. Yet, the broader struggle we are in requires a degree of unity the likes of which we have never seen and are not typically comfortable with. We’ve spent so much time as the comfortable majority, that we’ve had the luxury of practicing exclusively “values” politics. Watching clips of old debate shows from the 60’s and 70s, it all seems so innocent! Gore Vidal feuding with Norman Mailer on the Dick Cavett Show, Buckley debating Reagan on Firing Line about the fate of the Panama Canal. How cute. 40 years later, none of it matters in the least bit. Europe is on the verge of being irreversibly transformed. Most of California is lost, and much of the US has been overrun. Many of the areas which haven’t been, remain so isolated from the effects that they’re oblivious to the dangers of allowing themselves to be swamped with people from the third world. Some have even been convinced by corporate witch doctors that such enrichment will somehow benefit them.

As someone who comes politically from the right but culturally from the left, I can see the beginnings of a racially aware, “AltLeft” emerging. These are white people who may agree with a lot of progressive ideas or aesthetics, yet reject the postmodern anti-whitism and ethnomasochism that have come to dominate those circles. The intersectional, postmodern left hates white people, and some of them(more than you think) are becoming wise to this. No enemies to the right? How about no enemies to the white?

 

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. ashv · November 9, 2015

    The problem is when people start treating “white” as an identity, instead of what you rightly describe it as: a coalition. The chief problem of “white nationalism” as an ideology is that it gives up the ability to recognize that conflicts with outgroups are a _result_ of intragroup conflict. Winning the war will require suppressing the defectors who have used other ethnic groups to advance their own position — and for that you need something besides just shared ancestry to distinguish friend from foe.

    Like

    • B.W. Rabbit · November 9, 2015

      I agree with you, but “white nationalism” is really just a catchall term. Almost all contemporary identitarian movements recognize and wish to preserve the distinct identities among various European peoples. Modern nationalist literature reflects this(see Generation Identity by Markus Willinger,) as do the platforms of the many rising nationalist parties in Europe(even those who promote a pan-european agenda.) “WN” as an identity is more of an American thing. Most Americans have already been mixed with other Europeans to an extent that we are left with an “American” identity, which at least presently is already associated with many undesirable things. Pointing out traitors and defectors is an important component. In a way, this post is meant to identify them(or at the very least those who are not reliable allies.)

      Like

  2. Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2015/11/15) | The Reactivity Place
  3. Leiff · November 19, 2015

    “If a group of muslims was attacking a pretty teenage white girl…”
    If I save this girl from the Muslims, does she become mine? Does she owe me a life-debt? Or does she go her merry way, likely with ideas of how it was all somehow my fault she was attacked in the first place.

    Like

    • B.W. Rabbit · November 20, 2015

      She owes you nothing. You don’t save her because you deserve something or because of what you’ll get as a reward, but because she’s one of your own kind.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s